How can I find out whether I was exposed to DES, and the actions I need to
take if so?
Many people do not know that they were exposed to DES. Mothers may not have
known they were taking DES or remember the kinds of medication they were
given when they were pregnant; some prescription vitamins included DES. Any
woman who received medication during pregnancy primarily between 1938 and
1971, and the child she was carrying, may be DES exposed. Try to get the
medical records from your (or your mother's) pregnancy from either the
attending physician, the medical records department of the hospital where
the birth took place, or the pharmacy where the prescriptions were filled.
All DES daughters need regular screening exams for CCA throughout their
lives; in addition, they need special care beginning in the first weeks of
pregnancy, even if they have already had children. DES sons should practice
testicular self-examination regularly because of increased risk for
non-cancerous cysts as well as for cancer. DES mothers are advised to pay
particular attention to their breast care because they may be at increased
risk for breast cancer.
>>>>For more information: DES Action; DES Cancer Network |
What medications are I or my family taking, who manufactures them, how have
they been tested, and what are their short- and long-term and
intergenerational side-effects?
The best place to start informing yourself is by consulting two sources, the
Physicians Desk Reference and Worst Pills, Best Pills. Be sure to ask for
"med-guides" from your physician and/or pharmacist for more detailed
information on your prescriptions, including contraindications and possible
side-effects.
>>>>For more information: Worst Pills, Best Pills ; Physicians Desk Reference ;
Center for Medical Consumers |
What toxins has my food been exposed to before it reaches my table? What
are the effects of those toxins? What are the alternatives?
Dioxin is in all of our bodies, and the U.S. EPA estimates that 90% of that
dioxin comes from our food. For many Americans, more than three-quarters of that dioxin comes from beef and dairy products and from seafood. Dioxin
accumulates in fat and works its way up the food chain. People with high
levels of dioxin in their bodies may experience infertility, higher rates of
endometriosis in women, and immune system damage.
Dioxin from incinerators and cement kilns can travel in the wind for up to
1,000 miles, attached to dust particles or water vapor. Even though few
dairy and beef farms are in the immediate vicinity of dioxin-emitting
incinerators, airborne dioxin falls on pastures of grazing land, where it
sticks to the grass or hay, which is eaten by cattle.
Once in the air, dioxin washes out or settles onto soil, plants, water and
the beds of rivers, lakes and the sea. Deep-ocean fish have lower levels of
dioxin, but coastal fish and shellfish have higher levels due to pollution
of coastal sediments. Low-income communities are often more likely to rely
on subsistence fishing to provide food and thus are even more likely to be
affected than the general population. These communities are also much more
often the locations for incinerators of all kinds.
We can drastically cut our dioxin exposure by reducing our consumption of
fish, poultry, meat and dairy products, but the elimination of animal fats
from our diets will not stop the continued production of dioxins, nor will
it protect those who live near industrial sites and dumps contaminated by
dioxins that they absorb directly through their water and air.
Actions to reduce dioxin contamination of the U.S. food supply include
phasing out chemical production that generates chlorine-containing waste,
and switching from waste incineration to recycling.
Although plant matter takes up less dioxin from the soil, even organic
vegetables are susceptible to contamination by airborne pesticide "drift."
This means that no one can live in a nontoxic environment if their community
is using pesticides; aerial spraying causes approximately five times greater
loss of pesticides to drift than ground spraying, and even under ideal
conditions only about 50% of the spray reaches the target when aerially
applied. The rest goes wherever the wind carries it. The only way to stop
the problem of drift is to change broadcast spraying methods, and to explore
non-toxic methods for community pest control.
>>>>For more information: National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides ;
Mothers and Others for a Livable Planet ; Citizens Clearinghouse for
Hazardous Waste |
Where is the nearest incinerator to my home? What is being burned there,
and what are the risks from emissions?
Incinerators have been dubbed "landfills in the sky," because they transform
toxic waste into gaseous emissions which are dispersed into the air over
land and into the water regardless of whether they are burning hazardous,
medical, military, municipal or Superfund waste. Newer, safer alternatives
to incineration currently exist, but billions of dollars in contracts and
outdated EPA policies perpetuate incineration across the country.
There are no epidemiological studies to validate the EPA's position that
incinerators pose no risk to human health or the environment. Such
assurances are based upon the dubious art of "health risk assessments,"
written by consultants who work for the incinerator industry.
As a first step, call your state EPA to find out about incinerators in your
area; but bear in mind that they will not have a complete inventory of
sites. Call hospitals in your area and ask if they burn their medical waste
on-site. And finally, use the resources listed below to connect to
campaigns in your area.
>>>>For more information: Taking Action to Stop Dioxin Exposure ; National
Coalition Against Incineration; Health Care Without Harm/ Citizens
Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste |
How can I clean up the toxins in my workplace, and how can I find out what
non-toxic alternatives might exist?
Workers are on the `front-line' of chemical exposure, often exposed to high
concentrations of toxins. The effects may take time to show, or may appear
in the workers' children. In some industries, such as electronics, people
of color and women of child-bearing age are those most heavily exposed to
the toxic chemicals.
If your occupation is covered by the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), you have the right to annual training in chemical
hazards, the right to have the hazardous materials you work with properly
labeled, and the right to know about the hazardous substances you are being
exposed to through "material safety data sheets" (which are written by the
producers and/or the users of the chemicals). In addition, most states have
their own right-to-know acts, which give all workers the above rights
regardless of their federal OSHA status. If you are in a union, you have
the additional option of writing specific health and safety language into
your contract.
If you have questions or concerns about the risks you are running at work,
you should contact your state COSH (Committee for Occupational Safety and
Health) group - if there isn't one in your state, call the one nearest to
you. Information on alternative substances varies from industry to
industry, but a good place to begin is the Toxic Use Reduction Institute.
>>>>For more information: NYCOSH; Toxic Use Reduction Institute |
How can I balance eliminating toxic industries from my community with the
risk of the workers losing their family's livelihoods - maybe even my own
family's livelihood?
Justice for the ecosystem and justice for working people are inseparable --
just as pollution respects no national boundaries, neither does the
stateless multinational corporation. The rules of the game allow giant
corporations to flee to low wage and low regulatory areas of the globe.
Just by threatening to leave, these giants gain enormous leverage over North
American public policy; to add insult to injury, this also allows corporate
interests to pit dislocated workers and environmental advocates against each
other. By preying on job fear, groups like the Wise Use Movement reach out
to working people, using them as cannon fodder in their attack on
environmental regulations.
Any hope of a sustainable future has to rely on getting working people from
here to there with their lives and livelihoods intact. What is needed is a
"Just Transitions" policy providing full income for working people and
support for communities negatively impacted by bans and phase-outs of
hazardous substances.
>>>>For more information: Public Health Institute |
Sources -- See Resource List for Organizations:
DES: The Basic Booklet, National Institute of Health 1995 (DES Action)
"Our Barbies, Ourselves: The End of Innocence in the Age of Dioxin," The
Green Guide #23, 4/18/96 (Mothers and Others)
Taking Action to Stop Dioxin Exposure (Citizens Clearinghouse for Hazardous
Waste)
"Where There is Spray, There is Drift," The Green Guide #11, 6/1/95 (Mothers
and Others) |